The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in educational technology (EdTech) has brought unparalleled convenience and efficiency to classrooms worldwide. However, as we embrace these advancements, it is crucial to recognize the significant challenges they pose to the autonomy and professional judgment of instructors.

The escalating prevalence of AI-powered educational platforms, such as Chegg and Quizplus, comes at the expense of personalized instruction and the cultivation of critical thinking abilities.

One of the primary concerns associated with AI-driven tools in education is the depersonalization of instruction. These tools often rely on pre-packaged digital content and standardized solutions, leaving little room for instructors to tailor their teaching methods.

Each learner possesses unique characteristics, including distinct learning styles, strengths and weaknesses. Instructors, armed with their wealth of experience and expertise, are best positioned to customize their approaches to cater to these individual needs. However, these platforms restrict their ability to do so effectively, resulting in a one-size-fits-all approach that fails to engage and inspire students to reach their maximum potential.

EdTech companies offer step-by-step solutions to textbook problems, designed as study aids. Nevertheless, some students exploit this feature, employing it as a means to merely replicate solutions without comprehending the underlying concepts. Consequently, plagiarism and cheating on assignments and exams become pervasive.

While these platforms may offer convenience, their automated nature can be exploited for academic dishonesty. Students may utilize external resources or collaborate with others during quizzes., compromising the accuracy and integrity of their learning outcomes.

The implications of this depersonalization and the surge in academic dishonesty are far-reaching. By diminishing the role of instructors as facilitators of meaningful interactions, we run the risk of stunting the growth of critical thinking and problem-solving skills among students. 

Education should not solely focus on knowledge acquisition, but should also foster the ability to analyze, evaluate and apply that knowledge in real-world contexts. Through dynamic classroom discussions, collaborative projects and hands-on activities, instructors play a pivotal role in nurturing these essential skills.

AI-driven platforms, with their standardized solutions and automated features, are ill-equipped to provide the same level of engagement and intellectual stimulation as human instructors. While these EdTech platforms undeniably have their merits, we must not lose sight of the importance of preserving instructor autonomy and the holistic educational experience they provide.

Instead of relying solely on pre-packaged content and standardized solutions, these tools should be designed to augment and complement the role of instructors, empowering them to adapt and customize their approaches while leveraging the benefits of technology. 

Furthermore, addressing the issue of cheating facilitated by platforms like Chegg and Quizplus requires robust measures. Collaboration between instructors, educational institutions and EdTech providers is imperative to ensure academic integrity and uphold the value of genuine learning.

Photo by: Mikhail Nilov via  Pexels