California Gov. Jerry Brown recently signed into law Assembly Bill 2888 and Assembly Bill 701 in response to the public outcry over the lenient sentencing of Stanford swimmer Brock Turner after he was convicted of sexually assaulting an intoxicated and unconscious woman.
Assembly Bill 2888 would prohibit judges from sentencing convicted offenders with probation after they sexually assault someone who is unconscious or intoxicated, while Assembly Bill 701 expands the legal definition of rape to include non-consensual sexual assault. California law originally only defined rape as “an act of sexual intercourse.”
President Obama also recently signed into law the Sexual Assault Survivors’ Rights Act as a way to standardize how sexual assault cases are handled across the country.
Turner was convicted of three felonies in relation to sexual assault and was only sentenced to six months in jail, of which he only served three for good behavior, three years of probation, and a sex offender management program in which he will have to register as a sex offender for the rest of his life.
Turner received such a lenient sentencing because Judge Aaron Persky publicly stated that “a prison sentence would have a severe impact on him.” Persky, who was also a standout athlete at Stanford, appeared to view himself in Turner and felt he was just a college athlete who made a bad mistake.
That goes against common sense because the whole point of dealing with the consequences of making a bad decision is what keeps most people from making bad decisions in the first place.
Why are these laws being signed in reaction to the Brock Turner case? Laws are supposed to be in place in order to prevent crime, not react to it.
The big problem with this case is that while Persky was worried about the effect a “harsh sentence” would have on Turner, what consideration was given to the effect this will have on the life of Turners victim who has never been publicly identified? What does this say about us as a society?
Leniency for a heinous crime such as sexual assault is simply unacceptable. Whatever the circumstances, the offenders of such acts should be held accountable. The fact that Brown and Obama have signed these laws after the Turner case is also unacceptable.
There is also the sad fact that many who oppose the recent laws enacted by Brown say that it will be unfair to the next kid who is convicted of sexual assault. High priced defense attorneys will probably use the leniency shown to Turner as a defense for their next sexual assault client.
As a society, we have to do better than this. These are horrible crimes and those who are guilty of them should be treated as the criminals they are, not let off with a slap on the wrist because the consequences of their actions may negatively impact their future. Think of the victims of these crimes and how lenient sentences for these criminals will affect their futures.
10 COMMENTS
Comments are closed.
Dear California Governor Jerry Brown,
###On CBSNEWS: @Trippy hippy said”We do not drag victims through the mud and public opinion since they did nothing wrong.”###
___Accusations from this anonymous girl in Brock Turner’s case under a PRETENTIOUS moniker ‘Emily Doe’ had been much hyped which created a lot of conflicts to our society; and she had gained a lot of sympathy from the public; But, She did it wrong when she overdrunk by herself while playing around in a wild party; She did it wrong when she allow some PRETENTIOUS and COWARDICE feminism extremists like Mr. Jeff Rosen and Ms. Michele Dauber to use her case to manipulate public opinion while being set up as an anonymous prop; She did it wrong to remain anonymous when immense amount of hate was accumulated against him on her accusations coming out of her drunken memory, and under a PRETENTIOUS moniker ‘Emily Doe’; She did it wrong to refuse to let her testimony go through public scrutiny (I won’t call it ‘drag victims through the mud’) under her real name while he was sentenced in a case which will influence the rest of his life; And such of her accusations coming out of her DRUNKEN MEMORY under such a PRETENTIOUS moniker ‘Emily Doe’ was even used to call for a new law AB 2888?___FUNNY TO HELL! She did do it wrong for remaining anonymous on top of all the mess;___Don’t you think so, Governor Brown?
Dear California Gov. Jerry Brown,
___Brock Turner is more trustworthy than that girl ‘Emily Doe’, because Brock Turner speaks under his real name, while Emily Doe is just a PRETENTIOUS moniker; While someone hailed that girl as a hero and claimed to believe in her, I’d call her a COWARD and untrustworthy;
___ On top of all the mess, this girl would be very much insincere and untrustworthy to still remain anonymous, if she wants to have Ms. Michele Dauber / Mr. Jeff Rosen or anyone else to use her case to manipulate public opinion, she needs to show us her real identity to withstand public scrutiny;
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
>>On CBSNews a commenter named ‘kateslate’ said: “Uh….he is the one who committed a crime. Not her.”
___This case was overblown to the whole society by a pact of fascists; While this girl hiding under a PRETENTIOUS moniker ‘Emily Doe’ was set up as an anonymous prop in this conspiracy; At this moment, Brock Turner is a victim to fascism persecution, but not a criminal;
___The purpose for the public to know her real identity is to see if her testimony under her real name can fit the background and can withstand public scrutiny; If her testimony can not withstand public scrutiny, he might not be as guilty as the jury found out, and she might not be as innocent as she claims; she needs to show us her real identity to see if her testimony can withstand public scrutiny under her real identity; So far she failed to do so; so her testimony carries no credibility to gain public sympathy or to manipulate public opinion; so the jury’s finding on Brock Turner’s guilty conclusion is in question in public opinion;
___Therefore, if her testimony cannot withstand public scrutiny under her real identity, her status as a victim would be in question;
Dear California Gov. Jerry Brown,
Woman can sexual assault man as well; In Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case [Stanford police case number: IR #04-111-0335; Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler] http://alturl.com/pa672 , this Criminal Suspect Gabriele Scheler kicked me, and then suddenly stabbed me with a pen from behind while I was facing the robot, and then she repeatedly kicked on my groin part; when I told her: ‘You got it, very painful’, she replied: “it’s not good for fertilizer, eh?” ___Isn’t that a typical sexual assault behavior? How could such obscene behaviors be ignored by those judicial officers?
What do you legislators think about such lewd behavior? Why not pass a bill to bring such female sex offender criminal to justice?
……………………………..
___California Governor Jerry Brown, What do you think about Gabriele Scheler’s Atrocity on me which also happened on Stanford campus? What do you think about those bloody stripes on me due to Scheler’s assault? What do you think about the miscarriage of justice situation of Scheler’s case by hidden judicial officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV from Santa Clara DA’s Office led by Mr. Jeff Rosen? What do you think about the retaliatory fascism crimes coming out of Scheler’s case that had created endless tragedies to human soceity for over 12 years and counting?
___Also, Governor Brown, those 66 legislators behind this Assembly Bill 2888, e.g. Santa Clara DA Mr. Jeff Rosen Evan Low (D-Silicon Valley) Bill Dodd (D-Napa) and Alaleh Kiancerci of Santa Clara Deputy District Attorney, are all posers; their overzealous action in Brock Turner’s case while being PRETENTIOUS and COWARDICE to the anti-humanity crimes coming out of the much heavier Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case indicates that they did not do it for the Fairness and Justice of our society; they must have hided something beyond what they had told us; therefore, not one of them can be trusted by our society___don’t you think so?
……………………………..
CC: Jerry Hill (D-San Mateo) / Evan Low (D-Campbell) / Bill Dodd (D-Napa) / Cristina Garcia (D-Bell Gardens) / Susan Eggman (D-Stockton) / Assemblywoman Catharine Baker / Victoria Henley /Hannah Beth Jackson, and all the 66 legislators behind Assembly Bill 2888 …
Dear California Gov. Jerry Brown,
There is something much heavier than Campus Atrocity, Sexual Assault, Assembly Bill 2888, etc. i.e. fascism crimes coming out of the miscarriage of justice of Gabriele Scheler’s case by those hidden judicial officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV from Santa Clara DA’s Office led by Mr. Jeff Rosen who proposed this questionable Assembly Bill 2888:
___As a victim to a much heavier Stanford Campus Atrocity Case [[Stanford police case number: IR #04-111-0335; Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler]] (attention to the 7 photo evidence) , I’d invite (1) all the 1.3 million of those who had signed this ‘calling for Persky’s removal’ Petition, (2) all the 66 legislators passing California Assembly Bill AB 2888, (3) members from Gender Card Groups UltraViolet / GRLCVLT, and also those (4) more than 1,000 self-identified survivors of sexual assault and domestic violence from the women’s advocacy group UltraViolet, as well as (5) Superior Court administration, and (6) California Commission on Judicial Performance to look into the much heavier Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity case; I want to hear what they think about those bloody-stripes on me due to Scheler’s assault; I want to hear their opinion on the miscarriage of justice of this case for over 12 years at judicial system; How could it last that long?
___I’d tell them that
Stanford Law Professor Michele Dauber , Santa Clara District Attorney Jeff Rosen , Alaleh Kiancerci of Santa Clara County deputy district attorney and also those 66 legislators passing California Assembly Bill AB 2888, did not do it in earnest (actually very PRETENTIOUS); they do not have the credibility as judicial officers or law professors or just as human beings, because they had deliberately ignored / covered up all the anti-humanity crimes coming out of the much heavier Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity case___ Under such a situation, their outcry for fairness and justice in name of anyone is very PHONY; so don’t appreciate it;
Dear California Gov. Jerry Brown,
___Gabriele Scheler’s crimes (ATTACHED 7) were aggravated by a pack of fascists behind her; Scheler had never regretted on such serious crimes she had committed, but count on those powerful fascists to rival rules of laws; for over 12 years, a lot more tragedies had been created based on her false accusations; Scheler and the fascism powers behind her had gone too far; Scheler needs to be brought to justice, so do those fascists on her side who had committed the much heavier retaliatory fascism crimes through these many years, including her collateral Sebastian Thrun, Stanford Villain JJJ Mr. John Arrilaga who also backed up a fascism coup in Stanford University, hidden judicial officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV from Santa Clara District Attorney’s Office led by Mr. Jeff Rosen, and also their fascism collateral Kaifu Lee who colluded with those fascists on side of Sebastian Thrun / Gabriele Scheler to retaliate on me from China, etc.
___Though I am not a professional law practitioner, by common sense, what Gabriele Scheler and those fascists had done would be serious enough to get them arrested and send them to jail ___ Anyone disagree?
Dear California Gov. Jerry Brown,
___It is strange that Mr. Jeff Rosen of Santa Clara District Attorney could remain unscathed in this PHONY ‘Recall Judge Persky Campaign’
Mr. Jeff Rosen of Santa Clara District Attorney had lost big in his attempt at appealing Judge Persky, as he conceded on 06/17/2016 that ‘he says the Turner sentence legally was within the bounds of judicial discretion, and he does not favor a recall.’; but a man of his position cannot afford to lose; so he came back to make a scene in order to save his face;
However, Mr. Rosen’s outcry for harsher punishment for sexual assault crime is very PHONY when he deliberately covered up a much heavier Stanford Campus Atrocity Case [Stanford police case number: IR #04-111-0335; Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler] alturl dot com/pa672 which had produced endless tragedies to human society in the past 12 years and counting; Mr. Jeff Rosen so far hasn’t realized his mistake; he’s still trying to cover up Scheler’s crimes with dishonest excuses; I bet Mr. Jeff Rosen did it for some untold political reasons; maybe he needs support from powerful fascists on side of Gabriele Scheler / Sebastian Thrun to run for re-election or expects to run for a bigger post (California Attorney General?) later on; and that could be a factor___Mr. Rosen poised to play as a hero out of Turner’s Case, but his play is very Selfish and very PRETENTIOUS; Mr. Rosen is a Villain in Scheler’s Case;
Mr. Jeff Rosen of Santa Clara District Attorney has no credibility to be a judicial officer because he had failed his lawful responsibility to clarify a much heavier Stanford Campus Atrocity Case [Stanford police case number: IR #04-111-0335; Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler] http://alturl.com/pa672 (attention to the 7 photo evidence) and failed to protect victims and failed to find justice to those fascists, because if all crimes in Scheler’s case clarified, he might have to be brought to justice too;
I am sure those 66-0 legislator voters (e.g. Bill Dodd (D-Napa) / Evan Low (D-Silicon Valley)) would become ‘unanimously’ PRETENTIOUS and COWARDICE when being challenged with the fascism crimes coming out of the much heavier Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case___The way I see you legislators in this action: a bunch of posers;
……………………………….
___California Gov. Jerry Brown, what do you think about such biased and COWARDICE and PRETENTIOUS behaviors from Santa Clara DA Mr. Jeff Rosen who proposed such Assembly Bill 2888 which was based on the testimony out of the DRUNKEN memory from that no name anonymous girl hiding behind a PRETENTIOUS moniker ‘Emily Doe’?
……………………………….
CC: Jerry Hill (D-San Mateo) / Evan Low (D-Campbell) / Bill Dodd (D-Napa) / Cristina Garcia (D-Bell Gardens) / Susan Eggman (D-Stockton) / Assemblywoman Catharine Baker / Victoria Henley /Hannah Beth Jackson, and all the 66 legislators behind Assembly Bill 2888 …
********************************************
### Evan Low said: “Judge Persky’s ruling was unjustifiable and morally wrong, however, under current state law it was within his discretion,” ###
___Evan Low (D-Silicon Valley) is just a lowly snobbish politician without class; he stabbed Judge Persky in the back at his most difficult time; he became PRETENTIOUS and COWARDICE when being challenged with the much heavier Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case;
____________ Ms. Laurie Smith, a Feminism Extremist on Stage ____________
Dear Ms. Laurie Smith of Santa Clara Sheriff Chief,
Would you please give us candid answers right in front of California Governor Jerry Brown:
___Are you also a feminism extremist? the likes of Stanford Law Professor Ms. Michele Dauber and of Santa Clara DA Mr. Jeff Rosen?
According to a video clip in a September, 4, 2016 report posted on wiat.com titled: ‘California Sheriff unhappy with Brock Turner sentence’, you said that “I am not happy with the sentence (of Brock Turner’s Case)” and that “Anybody charged with convicted of rape ought to do time of prison; and that’s why I am supporting Assembly Bill 2888; It’s on the Governor’s desk right now …”
___Ms. Smith, on official document, Brock Turner’s Case is a sexual assault case, but not a rape case; so you are making a fuss right in front of the media; how unprofessional!
___Ms. Smith, Brock Truner needs to be protected from the overblown of his case to the whole society, don’t you think so? Also, on top of all the mess, this victim girl in Brock Turner’s case would be very much insincere and untrustworthy to still remain anonymous; If she wants to have Ms. Michele Dauber / Mr. Jeff Rosen or anyone else to use her case to manipulate public opinion, she needs to show us her real identity in order to withstand public scrutiny, don’t you think so, too?
___Ms. Smith, Woman can sexual assault man as well; In Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case [Stanford police case number: IR #04-111-0335; Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler], this Criminal Suspect Gabriele Scheler kicked me, and then suddenly stabbed me with a pen from behind while I was facing the robot, and then she repeatedly kicked on my groin part; when I told her: ‘You got it, very painful’, she replied: “it’s not good for fertilizer, eh?” ___Isn’t that a typical sexual assault behavior? How could such obscene behaviors be ignored by those judicial officers? What do you think about such lewd behavior? What do you think about those bloody stripes on me due to Scheler’s assault? Why not urge legislators to pass a bill to bring such female sex offender criminal to justice?
___Ms. Smith, there are serious retaliatory fascism crimes originated in Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case happened right here on land of Santa Clara County of California, under your jurisdiction; But how could this criminal suspect Gabriele Scheler still at large? Why hasn’t Scheler been arrested till today? What is worse, there are some hidden judicial officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV from Santa Clara DA’s Office led by Mr. Jeff Rosen, who had actively colluded with those fascists on side of the criminal suspect Gabriele Scheler to retaliate on the victims___they are part of this fascism conspiracy and they became the real menace to our society___What do you think about such a situation?
___Ms. Smith, before you can conqur crimes in Gabriele Scheler’s Case, and before you can arrest those fascists in Gabriele Scheler’s Case, how could you have any credibility to publicly talk about Brock Turner’s case or any other criminal case?
___Ms. Smith, isn’t that a basic instinct that embedded into the spirits of us all to spontaneously fight against such anti-humanity crimes?
___Ms. Smith, If there are any questions, please, don’t hesitate to ask; My contact: caomingpeter126-at-126-dot-com
Sincerely,
Peter Cao
___Mr. Tessier-Lavigne, is that you who authorize Ms. Lauren Schoenthaler of a recently appointed Stanford Senior Associate Vice Provost to speak on behalf of the Stanford Community to blame it all on Brock Turner while apologize to that no name anonymous girl hiding beind a PRETENTIOUS moniker ‘Emily Doe’ in the much hyped Brock Turner’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case?
…………………..
___Mr. Marc Tessier-Lavigne,Someone from inside of Stanford University must have given approval to the recent ‘heavier punishment on ‘Brock Turner’ and ‘Recall Judge Persky Campaign’, led by Mr. Jeff Rosen of Santa Clara District Attorney and Stanford Law Professor Michele Dauber, both of whom are like you being PRETENTIOUS and COWARDICE to such a public challenge___Mr. Marc Tessier-Lavigne, is that you or those fascists who tried to install you from inside of Stanford University who are behind such a conspiracy? Did someone (Ms. Hillary Clinton) played the gender card via Stanford Law Professor Michele Dauber in this PHONY ‘heavier punishment on ‘Brock Turner’ and ‘Recall Judge Persky Campaign’? but Why sacrifice Brock Truner and Judge Persky while covering up the much heavier Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case?___Cause it is those fascists (some listed in this public challenge) behind Gabriele Scheler who tried to help you THEFT Stanford Presidency through this fascism conspiracy, right?
___Mr. Marc Tessier-Lavigne, whatever, you are a product of fascism crimes in the middle of a War of Anti-Fascism VS Fascism going on in Stanford University for 12 years and counting; you do not deserve Stanford Presidency; you are a THEF, and once a THEF, always a THEF; and this public challenge will follow wherever your name display;
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Dear Ms. Lauren Schoenthaler, a recently appointed Stanford Senior Associate Vice Provost for institutional equity and access ,
About your interview on September 2, 2016 posted on Stanford News titled: ‘Q&A: Sexual violence prevention and response at Stanford’; it reads:
### I don’t know Emily Doe, but like millions of others who read her extraordinary letter to Brock Turner, I am incredibly impressed by this young woman. She has individually and personally been able to shine a spotlight on campus rape, and she has moved the conversation from the steps of campus administration buildings to family dinner tables all around the country. … Emily Doe should not have been sexually assaulted anywhere, and she should not have been sexually assaulted at Stanford. On behalf of the Stanford community, I offer my heartfelt apology that this happened to her …” ###
___Brock Turner is more trustworthy than that girl ‘Emily Doe’, because Brock Turner speaks under his real name, while Emily Doe is just a PRETENTIOUS moniker; While someone hailed that girl as a hero and claimed to believe in her, I’d call her a COWARD and untrustworthy;
___Yeah, that girl should not have been sexually assaulted on any campus, but she should not have drunk way too much while playing around in a wild party, either; she should not further allow some PRETENTIOUS and COWARDICE figures like Stanford Law Professor Ms. Michele Dauber to take advantage of her case and manipulate public opinion while still remains anonymous; It did happen in an event of protest at the San Jose Courthouse organized by Ms. Dauber yesterday, on the day Brock Turner was released;
___Santa Clara DA Mr. Jeff Rosen and Stanford Law Professor Ms. Michele Dauber’s overzealous performance in Turner’s case had raised a lot of conflicts in our society while they became PRETENTIOUS and COWARDICE when being challenged with the much heavier Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case, which indicates that they didn’t do it for the ‘fairness and justice’ of our society; they must have hided something beyond what they had told us; So I’d tell this girl to Watch Out! when they set her up as a prop, especially as an anonymous prop;
___On top of all the mess, this girl would be very much insincere and untrustworthy to still remain anonymous, if she wants to have Ms. Michele Dauber / Mr. Jeff Rosen or anyone else to use her case to manipulate public opinion, she needs to show us her real identity in order to withstand public scrutiny,
___Therefore, it’s very much unfair to blame it all on Brock Turner while apologize to this anonymous girl who’s hiding behind a PRETENTIOUS moniker ‘Emily Doe’;
___Santa Clara District Attorney’s office led by Mr. Jeff Rosen, who’s handling Turner’s Case, had no credibility as judicial officers because they failed to clarify a much heavier Stanford Campus Atrocity Case; [Stanford police case number: IR #04-111-0335; Victim: Peter Cao; Criminal Suspect: Gabriele Scheler] alturl dot com/pa672 and failed to protect victims and failed to bring those fascists to justice;
We know Turner was found guilty in a Stanford sexual assault case (I am not good at legal terms like ‘sexual assault’ or ‘rape’ or what’s the difference) and he will face the consequences; he had remorsed and the rest of his life would be influenced; but it should not be the end of his everything;
I remember in Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case, this Criminal Suspect Gabriele Scheler kicked me, and then suddenly stabbed me with a pen from behind while I was facing the robot, and then she repeatedly kicked on my groin part; when I told her: ‘You got it, very painful’, she replied: “it’s not good for fertilizer, eh?” ___Isn’t that a typical sexual assault behavior? How could such obscene behaviors be ignored by those judicial officers?
Over the years I had either sent materials directly to judicial authorities or post evidence on the web to publicly challenge such crimes; but those officers handling this case dare never confront me to clarify the case, but hided in the darkness and intrude my privacy and generated all kinds of ridiculous excuses to cover up the criminal suspect like: ‘you should call police’ … and then I said I did go to police and directly filed report, and then they generated another excuse: ‘Scheler called 911 first, whoever called 911 first became complainant’ … and then I said ‘I don’t believe there is a law saying whoever calls 911 first becomes complainant; as a matter of fact, I did report to authorities well ahead of Gabriele Scheler did, so in reality I am the original complainant’; … and then no follow-ups; while I post this public challenge on the web and challenge them every day, those officers failed to take the action but actively plotted numerous conspiracies against the victim like me; till today, for over 12 years, fascism still prevails, miscarriage of justice is still going on; and then they said: ‘Statue time of limitation had expired’ (Whose the fault is it then?); How SHAMELESS an excuse like this could be! ___ What kind of judicial officers are these? Who are they actually working for? Can we count on them to guard our living safety? Can we expect them to bring those fascists to justice?
Why bluffing Turner’s Case while completely ignoring Scheler’s case? didn’t Mr. Jeff Rosen realize that Scheler’s case had produced endless tragedies to human society in the past 12 years and counting? Turner had been trailed and remorsed and sentenced; Scheler never was; Scheler had recanted her testimony and falsely accused me for ‘sexual assault’ on no evidence while hiding her recanted testimony; and the false accusations from this criminal suspect Gabriele Scheler had been colluded by some hidden judicial officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV (from Santa Clara DA led by Mr. Jeff Rosen); and such of their conspiracy had produced even much heavier crimes;
Mr. Jeff Rosen so far hasn’t realized his mistake; he’s still trying to cover up Scheler’s crimes with dishonest excuses; If Mr. Jeff Rosen is not honest in Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case, how could we count on him over Turner’s case? Or on any other case? Under such a situation, their outcry for heavier punishment on Mr. Turner by those officers led by Santa Clara District Attorney Jeff Rosen is very PHONY___Anyone disagree?
I bet Mr. Jeff Rosen does it for some untold political reasons; maybe he needs support from powerful fascists on side of Gabriele Scheler / Sebastian Thrun to run for re-election or expects to run for a bigger post (California Attorney General?) later on; and that could be a factor …
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
>>Some COWARD argued for those Corrupted Officers led by Mr. Jeff Rosen “Do you want an honest answer as to why they (hidden officers ZZZ/YYY/VVV from Santa Clara DA’s Officer led by Mr. Jeff Rosen) are ignoring your case? Statute of limitations for sexual assault in California is 6 years, rape is 10. It has been 12 years.”
___You are not honest at all; ‘they’ (those judicial officers handling this case) are ingoring Scheler’s case because:
(1) ‘they’ are afraid of the fascism powers behind Gabriele Scheler;
(2) ‘they’ had played a role in Gabriele Scheler’s false accusations and in their retaliatory fascism crimes from fascists on Scheler’s side; If Scheler’s case clarified, ‘they’ would have to be brought to justice, too; so ignoring Scheler’s case means ignoring their own culpability;
___and that is the honest answer, right?
Dear California Gov. Jerry Brown, what do you think about such disparity coming out of the overblown of Brock Turner’s Case and all the evident anti-humanity crimes coming out of the much heavier Gabriele Scheler’s Stanford Campus Atrocity Case, both of which happened right here on land of California? I bet everyone is expecting to see a COURAGEOUS, FAIR and TRUTHFUL Governor from the Great State of California … don’t disappoint us, please, Governor Brown, the world is watching …